1. News
  2. SCİENCE
  3. White House Accuses Judge of Bias in Harvard Ruling

White House Accuses Judge of Bias in Harvard Ruling

featured
Share

Share This Post

or copy the link

In a recent ruling, Judge Burroughs acknowledged that district courts aim to adhere to Supreme Court decisions, yet noted the ambiguity surrounding the Supreme Court’s emergency directives on grant terminations, which have left many questions unanswered.

Judge Burroughs expressed understanding of the challenges faced by both the Supreme Court and district courts, highlighting their efforts to address complex issues expediently, often under emergency circumstances. However, she cautioned against criticism directed at district courts for allegedly ‘defying’ the Supreme Court, emphasizing that these courts are striving to navigate a rapidly changing legal framework while contending with both established precedent and interim guidance from the Supreme Court that lacks clarity and consensus.

White House condemns “activist Obama-appointed judge”

In response to the ruling, White House spokesperson Liz Huston announced that the government would file an immediate appeal, describing the decision as “egregious.” Huston claimed that President Trump had accurately anticipated the outcome, asserting that the “activist Obama-appointed judge” was predisposed to favor Harvard regardless of the evidence presented.

Furthermore, Huston stated that “Harvard does not have a constitutional right to taxpayer dollars” and indicated that the institution remains ineligible for future grants. She criticized Harvard, saying, “To any fair-minded observer, it is clear that Harvard University failed to protect their students from harassment and allowed discrimination to plague their campus for years.”

In a response to the ruling, Harvard President Alan Garber articulated that the decision “affirms Harvard’s First Amendment and procedural rights,” underscoring the university’s commitment to academic freedom, vital scientific research, and the foundational principles of American higher education.

Garber reiterated that the legal battle is ongoing, affirming that “we will continue to assess the implications of the opinion, monitor further legal developments, and remain vigilant in our efforts to accomplish our mission in this evolving landscape.”

White House Accuses Judge of Bias in Harvard Ruling
Comment

Tamamen Ücretsiz Olarak Bültenimize Abone Olabilirsin

Yeni haberlerden haberdar olmak için fırsatı kaçırma ve ücretsiz e-posta aboneliğini hemen başlat.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Login

To enjoy Technology Newso privileges, log in or create an account now, and it's completely free!