This article originally appeared on Inside Climate News, a nonprofit, non-partisan news organization that covers climate, energy, and the environment. Sign up for their newsletter here.
Since 2022, Republican lawmakers at both the federal level and in state attorney general offices have taken action against major financial institutions. Letters have been dispatched to prominent banks, pension funds, asset managers, accounting firms, various companies, nonprofits, and business alliances. These communications have warned of potential antitrust violations in a broader Republican response against initiatives associated with “environmental, social, and governance” (ESG) standards, particularly those involving corporate climate commitments.
“This situation has undeniably created considerable turmoil and anxiety throughout the system,” commented Denise Hearn, a senior fellow at the Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment. “Many were left wondering when a lawsuit would officially be filed.”
The anticipated lawsuit materialized in November, led by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton alongside ten other Republican state attorneys general. This legal action targets three major asset management firms—BlackRock, Vanguard, and State Street—accusing them of forming “an investment cartel” that aims to limit coal production, thereby increasing their profits while inadvertently raising energy prices for consumers. The Trump administration’s Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission further backed this initiative by filing a supportive brief in May.
The ongoing campaign against ESG-related practices is markedly influencing investor sentiment.
“In recent months, due to actions like this lawsuit and various communications from elected officials at both state and federal levels, we have observed a chilling effect on what investors express,” noted Steven Maze Rothstein, chief program officer of Ceres, a nonprofit advocating for sustainable business practices, and an early recipient of such letters. “Nevertheless, investors recognize that environmental realities remain unaffected by political officeholders.”
Just recently, a US District Court judge in Tyler, Texas, ruled against a motion to dismiss the case targeting the three asset management companies, although three of the twenty-one counts were dismissed. This ruling does not signify a final judgment; it merely indicates sufficient grounds for the case to proceed to trial.
