At the Western Environmental Law Center (WELC), Schlenker-Goodrich has raised alarms over the administration’s push to create a detachment from global collaborative efforts, warning of the adverse impact on the nation’s scientific research capabilities.
“This isolationism cannot be beneficial to American interests across any domain, especially in critical areas such as climate action and conservation,” he remarked. “Both issues are inherently global, carrying significant domestic implications; thus, our retreat from international engagement appears to be a grave error.”
Burger emphasized the administration’s climate and energy strategies as a “missed opportunity for the United States.” He articulated concerns about failing to assume a leadership role in the green economy and to maintain substantial political influence internationally on climate matters.
“We are in a limited timeframe to achieve significant reductions in greenhouse gas emissions, and we cannot afford to squander this time,” Burger added.
What will endure?
The uncertainty surrounding Trump’s initial 100 days as president raises significant questions, according to Burger. “Are these first 100 days marked by success in any form, or do they signify a complete failure?” he questioned. The continuation of any outcomes from this unpredictable period will largely depend on judicial responses to perceived threats against the rule of law and established administrative standards.
Gisler from the Southern Environmental Law Center (SELC) echoed this perspective, asserting that the long-term impact of the current administration will be shaped by national reactions. He referenced historical precedents, noting that after the “robber baron era,” the country experienced a wave of progressive support that led to crucial advancements like Social Security and food safety legislation.
“Disruption and chaos are expected in the coming years; however, the fundamental actions of this administration lack widespread backing from the majority of the populace, particularly on environmental issues,” Gisler stated.
Burger noted the discrepancy between numerous announcements, executive orders, and press releases from the White House and the lack of tangible administrative actions. He posited that if the legal processes unfold as intended, many of the administration’s directives “may ultimately be reversed.”
Groups such as the NRDC, WELC, and SELC are actively engaging in this struggle.
Michael Wall, chief litigation officer at NRDC, expressed his concerns, stating, “It appears their strategy is to inundate and overwhelm rather than adhere to legal protocols. We refuse to be overwhelmed.”
Inside Climate News reporter Lisa Sorg contributed to this article.
